The other issues or the challenges in this case study are as defined in the three different phases of the overall transformation of the Westlake Lanes to the Sugar Bowl which after the thorough qualitative as well as the quantitative analysis could be solved in this report which would be presented in the recommendations. Strength The first and the foremost strength of the company is its strong management which has not only helped the company in attaining the profitable conditions, but once again after the death of Mr.
In the midst of such a public health crisis, the obvious question to ask is why. Many reasons can be imagined for any public health failure, but we have no precedents for a failure of this magnitude.
Researchers in harder sciences have a name for such situations: Whether this is the case with the current epidemics is an all-too-regrettable possibility: The history of obesity and nutrition research suggests that this is indeed what has happened. But the German and Austrian thinking evaporated with the war, and the possibility that sugar was to blame never took hold, dismissed by a nutrition community who, by the s, became fixated on dietary fat as the trigger of our chronic diseases.
But this obscures the reality that prescriptions to prevent and treat the two depend almost entirely on two simple causal concepts, neither one of which is necessarily correct.
By this logic, whatever causes obesity is ultimately the cause of the diabetes as well. This thinking, espoused by the WHO and virtually every other medical authority, is a paradigm in the true Kuhnian sense of the word. This conception underlies virtually all aspects of obesity research from prevention through treatment, and, by association, diabetes.
The WHO and other health organisations have recently taken to arguing that sugar and particularly sugary beverages should be taxed heavily or regulated. By this thinking, we still get fatter because we eat too much or exercise too little. The solution is to eat in moderation, and consume sugar in moderation or balance it with more physical activity.
This is the only variable that matters. This logic has been the lifeblood of the sugar industry. If sugar was uniquely toxic, in that it possessed some special property that made us respond to it by accumulating fat or becoming diabetic, then government health agencies would have to regulate it.
If all sugar does is add calories to the diet, just as any other food does, then it is, in effect, benign. All foods supply calories and there is no difference between the calories that come from sugar or steak or grapefruit or ice cream.
Is it the right paradigm to understand the disorder? The competing hypothesis has existed for over a century: By this logic, the foods we eat influence fat accumulation not because of their caloric content but because of their macronutrient content, the proteins, fats and carbohydrates they contain.
It proposes that dysregulation of this exquisitely-evolved, finely-tuned homeostatic system a system that is biologically balanced is the necessary component to explain both the excessive storage of calories of fat — obesity — and the diabetes that accompanies it.
This alternate hypothesis implies that sugar has unique effects in the human body leading directly to both diabetes and obesity, independent of the calories consumed. By this way of thinking, refined sugars are indeed toxic, albeit over the course of years or decades.
If all this is right, then thinking of obesity as an energy-balance disorder is as meaningless as calling poverty a money-balance problem caused, of course, by earning too little or spending too much, or both.
Understanding how this happened requires we attend to history.
The modern era of nutrition science dates to the late s, when German researchers pioneered the use of room-sized devices called calorimeters. These allowed them to measure the energy expended by human or animal subjects under different conditions of diet and activity.
This was a function of the research tools available at the time, and it has remained the foundation of nutrition wisdom ever since. The idea of obesity as an energy-balance disorder emerged directly from what was considered one of the great triumphs in nutrition in the late 19th-century: In line with this research, nutritionists embraced calories and energy as the currency of their discipline, and physicians, speculating as to the cause of obesity, naturally did the same.
This logic is still with us today.
The existence of a fundamental fault, however, could not be dismissed so lightly, as German and Austrian investigators were still arguing at the time. Worth noting is that the German and Austrian research communities had pioneered all the fields of science relevant to understanding obesity — including nutrition, metabolism, endocrinology and genetics.
This was an era during which the lingua franca of science — medical or otherwise — was German, and when individuals serious about pursuing science travelled to Germany and Austria to learn from, if not mentor with, these authorities.
Von Bergmann pointed out that the overconsumption of energy that von Noorden was blaming as the cause of obesity — more energy in than out — was merely a description of what happened when the mass of any system increased, not an explanation at all.
The purpose of a hypothesis in science, quite simply, is to offer an explanation for what we observe, either in nature or the laboratory. How many of these observations can the hypothesis explain or predict in a simple and straightforward way?
Yet the energy-balance conception fails to explain anything: The question that had to be answered is why this trapping occurs. Any viable hypothesis of obesity had to explain why the fat tissue of the obese is so avid in hoarding calories as fat, rather than allowing that fat to be metabolised and provide energy for the body.Case Study Of A Patient With Diabetes Mellitus Nursing Essay.
Print Reference this. Disclaimer: continue reflo monitoring 4 hourly and to trace and review the fasting blood sugar (FBS). On examination, patient was found to be alert and responded well to the GCS with the score of 15/ We're here to answer any questions you have about. been narrowed to peanut butter, or a combination of ice cream, sugar, cocoa and mayonnaise.
Carl did not eat several foods (e.g., cola, beef, and butter) because he felt they contained diseases and germs that were poisonous. In addition, he was Case Summary #3 At the time of his admission to a private psychiatric hospital, Sonny Ford was a.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed a case study that has been chosen during the clinical practicum time. Mainly, it focused on one of current health problem . Apr 14, · If you need this or another essay you may order it via [email protected] Review this case study based on the sugar industry's alleged influence on research studies taken from the Google search resources listed below.
In a minimum of words assess who you would blame for the situation – the sugar . A student’s response must illustrate that an example about sugar causing hyperactivity that readily comes to mind would lead to acceptance of the conclusion of the study (e.g., . Harvard & HBR Business Case Study Solution and Analysis Online - Buy Harvard Case Study Solution and Analysis done by MBA writers for homework and assignments.
All of the solutions are custom written and solved individually once orders are placed.