Under deontology, an act may be considered right even if the act produces a bad consequence,  if it follows the rule or moral law. According to the deontological view, people have a duty to act in a way that does those things that are inherently good as acts "truth-telling" for exampleor follow an objectively obligatory rule as in rule utilitarianism. Immanuel Kant's theory of ethics is considered deontological for several different reasons.
A central theme among deontological theorists is that we have a duty to do those things that are inherently good "truth-telling" for example ; while the ends or consequences of our actions are important, our obligation or duty is to take the right action, even if the consequences of a given act may be bad.
It is sometimes described as "duty" or "obligation" based ethics, because deontologists believe that ethical rules "bind you to your duty". Assignment deontological vs teleological ethical term 'deontological' was first used in this way inin C.
Broad's book, Five Types of Ethical Theory. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted with consequentialist or teleological ethical theories, according to which the rightness of an action is determined by its consequences. However, there is a difference between deontological ethics and moral absolutism.
Deontologists who are also moral absolutists believe that some actions are wrong no matter what consequences follow from them. Immanuel Kant, for example, famously argued that it is always wrong to lie — even if a murderer is asking for the location of a potential victim.
Non-absolutist deontologists, such as W.
Ross, hold that the consequences of an action such as lying may sometimes make lying the right thing to do. Kant's and Ross's theories are discussed in more detail below.
Furthermore Jonathan Baron and Mark Spranca use the term Protected Values when referring to values governed by deontological rules. Broad first used the term 'deontological' in the way that is relevant here, he contrasted the term with 'teleological', where 'teleological' theories are those that are concerned with outcomes or consequences.
Broad's main concern was distinguishing the positions that different ethical theories took on the relationship between values and right action. The concepts of obligation are fundamental and the concepts of value are definable in terms of them. Thus it might be held that the notion of fittingness is fundamental, and that "X is intrinsically good" means that it is fitting for every rational being to desire X.
Such theories might be called Deontological. The concepts of value are fundamental, and the concepts of obligation are definable in terms of them. Such theories may be called Teleological. Bold print not in original Thus, the term 'deontological' picked out the set of ethical theories that are based on the idea that an action's being right or wrong is basic, and whether a situation is good or bad depends on whether the action that brought it about was right or wrong.
To illustrate, imagine that someone can bring it about that nobody in the world suffers from starvation.
However, to do so they would have to act in a way that was morally wrong. Perhaps, they would have to kill everyone currently living on land that could not support agriculture. A deontologist would state that the way that the end to starvation was brought about would mean that the 'world without starvation' was a bad state of affairs.
A teleologist, on Broad's use of the term, explains the rightness of actions in terms of the goodness of the state of affairs that occurs because of that action. If some action genuinely brings about greater good in the world, then it is a right action, and this rightness is independent of the nature of the action or the intentions of the person carrying out the action.
Broad points out that on this understanding of the distinction between 'deontological ethics' and 'teleological ethics', not all utilitarians are teleologists: But [Henry] Sidgwick, though a Utilitarian, definitely rejects the view that "right" means "conducive to good.
However, the Divine Command Theory, also known as 'theological voluntarism', is a form of deontological ethics, and a number of modern philosophers have also developed deontological ethical theories. A common contrast between deontology and consequentialist thinking is that the deontologist would argue that "the ends do not justify the means" vs "the ends justify the means".Deontological ethics theories- utilitarianism says you have additional files, scene, scene, is the ethical framework.
Utility, last edited: 23rd march, scene, or section of people. Of chapter, there are generally pretty good of essays, Consequentialism; Definition; Consequentialism is a normative ethical theory, which means, it is a theory about ethical action and a proposed method for deciding how one should choose the right ethical act.
(Feiser) Consequentialism says that the consequences of an action are all that matter when taking an ethical decision to act. This course will cover the main ethical theories (deontological, utilitarianism, divine command theory, Buddhist ethics, ethical egoism, virtue, situation, social contract), metaethical questions (sympathy vs.
Deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek δέον, deon, "obligation, duty"; and -λογία, -logia) is an approach to ethics that determines goodness or rightness from examining acts, or the rules and duties that the person doing the act strove to fulfill. Mar 24, · Business Communications Assignment Sorry if the voice quality isn't very good, my computer microphone obviously isn't the best. Learn bioethics 1 assignment with free interactive flashcards. Choose from different sets of bioethics 1 assignment flashcards on Quizlet.
duty, relativism, beyond good and evil, meaning of life) and application. Question 1: List and describe in depth the three teleological frameworks and the three deontological arteensevilla.com are the benefits and drawbacks of each? Of such six frameworks, with which one does you most relate?
Question 2: Describe the eight ethical principles in the Global Business Standards arteensevilla.com using these principles, explain an illustration of a company that does follow one of.
Jun 21, · Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted with consequentialist or teleological ethical theories, according to which the rightness of an action is determined by its consequences.
However, there is a difference between deontological ethics and moral arteensevilla.com: Resolved.
Ethical Considerations Essays (Examples) and as such, behaved in an ethical manner. From a teleological standpoint, my decision was a positive one since it was made in the sense and the sake of the final goal, that is the preservation of a good reputation for the candidate.
This paper will explore the ideas behind deontological and.